In Reply to: Fine, but . . . posted by Troy on May 25, 2004 at 07:40:16:
Please write then this message down - I have not expressed my opinion on that film - do you finally get it?Regarding the content - this is different story. Much has been written on it, so one can be familiar with it.
But that is not important... if you don't see Moore as spiteful and full of hatred, that is your right - I have no problem with it. Many would disagree with you on this one... but what does this have to do with movies?
It certainly looks like you have something stuck somewhere, as your last sentence is completely without any basis, as far as I can see.
I haven't done that, and have no intention of doing it, but one could certainly ask the question of the type: "The quoted source provided clear evidence of fact manipulation on part of Moore that is pure misrepresentation and lies - what is your response regarding that particular episode?"
See, no general comments, just a detailed analysis of his lies would suffice. Whether you like or don't his film is your problem, if you can'f address his lies that is another... AND FACTUAL.
Someone mentioned the changing tie episode... if you want to take just this small one and defend it - go ahead, if not - I see no reason to change my opinion on Moore.
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- You are deaf... I suspect... - Victor Khomenko 07:54:07 05/25/04 (5)
- Re: Is this not tiring Victor? - patrickU 10:31:20 05/25/04 (2)
- Exactly... after making ten circles I feel like changing the game. - Victor Khomenko 10:34:40 05/25/04 (1)
- Re: Ha ha.....nt - patrickU 10:52:22 05/25/04 (0)
- Why does it always degenerate to name calling with you? - Troy 09:11:06 05/25/04 (1)
- OK, so you ARE deaf... consider this a name. - Victor Khomenko 09:24:56 05/25/04 (0)