In Reply to: Re: " Whether intentional or not "..Oh boy! what a man of bad faith! posted by patrickU on June 17, 2004 at 23:44:10:
...I was trying to make is that it doesn't really matter what thought processes Mr. Moore employed in selecting his documentary's title as long as that title conveys the correct message and doesn't violate any copyright/trademark laws! Ray Bradbury may be unhappy, and he may even "feel" violated, but he's suffered no damage to his reputation or that of his book; I'm sure that he's aware of this even if he's grumbling over tha fact that Michael Moore's film doesn't agree with his own political viewpoint.BTW Patrick, and no offense, but if you can't tell the difference between a grammatical device and hedging then perhaps your opinions would be best served posting on European boards. Now if you know what's good for you you'll stick that finger you like to point at folks (i.e., when you don't know what you're talking about) back in the dyke before you drown!
AuPh
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- I was speaking r-h-e-t-o-r-i-c-a-l-l-y! In other words, it was a figure of speech; the ONLY point ... - Audiophilander 15:18:23 06/19/04 (4)
- Re: OK, you are quite right, I will not post here anymore, only on European boards, sorry for the disturbance.....nt - patrickU 01:58:29 06/20/04 (3)
- Sorry patrick, I'm not trying to run you off, but try to be a little less nasty with your insults, okay? - Audiophilander 21:08:22 06/20/04 (2)
- Re: Insults? Well.... - patrickU 09:33:05 06/21/04 (1)
- The "hiding behind..." crack; it not only was an insult directed at me... - Audiophilander 01:26:09 06/24/04 (0)