In Reply to: Since teaching an old Russian wolfhound new tricks requires a great deal more patience than I can muster at the moment: posted by Audiophilander on June 19, 2004 at 15:42:21:
Next task for you: figure out how thing doesn't need to be trademarked to be a trademark.Boy, you are really being obtuse. Those are simple things most educated people are supposed to know.
Funny, that apparently you spent sime looking for that trademark, when in reality you should have read about trademarks in general.
But you went for a simple shot, and you farted.
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- More homework for a lazy student - Victor Khomenko 18:17:55 06/20/04 (8)
- No offense, but are you really that dense, Victor? - Audiophilander 21:00:48 06/20/04 (7)
- Re: No offense, but are you really that dense, Victor? - Analog Scott 12:16:43 06/21/04 (0)
- Simply caught you with your pants down - Victor Khomenko 04:44:22 06/21/04 (5)
- The "source" was simply for your benefit; I already knew you were wrong on this. - Audiophilander 08:57:42 06/21/04 (4)
- Ahem... you will never bother to learn, apparently. - Victor Khomenko 09:23:37 06/21/04 (3)
- Sheeeeeeesh! He employed NO DUE DILIGENCE in stopping others from borrowing reference to his book's title! - Audiophilander 11:50:27 06/21/04 (2)
- But your Honor, murders have been commited before! Why judge me? - Victor Khomenko 12:04:02 06/21/04 (1)
- Yes, "Fahrenheit 452" could even be legally used in some instances (i.e., as in a parody of the author's original work)! - Audiophilander 12:17:57 06/21/04 (0)