In Reply to: One final pointer posted by Victor Khomenko on June 18, 2004 at 06:12:20:
A better argument than copyright which has no legal merit. However, trademark laws are very specific on purpose. They are there to protect the mercahnt from confusion as to whose goods are being sold. I don't think there is a strong case that Moore's movie title will create any confusion for the consumer. Now if he copied a logo design there might be a case.
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- Re: One final pointer - Analog Scott 12:12:16 06/21/04 (0)