In Reply to: With the exception of Minority Report, we're pretty much in agreement. posted by Audiophilander on July 22, 2004 at 22:55:08:
Logically it's horribly flawed: von Sydow's character could not possibly hope, merely by paying a guy to hang out in a hotel room with incriminating photos, to set in motion an eventual murder whose prognostication would lead to its being committed. The paradox is a closed circle with no genuine causal impetus. Had Cruise's character been given more conventional leads prior to his crime's being "pre-coged", the premise might have been believable.That said, I think this was a sort of return-to-form for Spielberg. It was a very well filmed and well-paced thriller, and for that I liked it. And while there's something dissatisfying to me about the second half, I think the better "reading" of the film is one in which its denouement is actually a Brazil-like dream rather than reality. It's not fresh, so I don't remember exactly, but there's some line about the criogenically frozen criminals having pleasant dreams, and I think the suggestion is clear that it's quite possible that the tidy happy ending of the film is just that.
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- Another way to watch minority report - Bulkington 09:53:40 07/23/04 (4)
- Hi Bulkington. Please tell me what you think... - orejones 11:28:16 07/23/04 (1)
- Huh - Bulkington 06:59:21 07/26/04 (0)
- The whole eyeball thing was over the top and so implausible as to be laughable. - Audiophilander 10:39:54 07/23/04 (1)
- Good crits. - Bulkington 13:22:59 07/25/04 (0)