In Reply to: Starman isn't a bad SF film, in spite of its somewhat predictable melodramatic elements, ... posted by Audiophilander on March 17, 2005 at 22:54:56:
The Thing a good film? I mean the Carpenter version! You must be jocking! Well I saw it once and I remember vidly how bad it was, The Hawk one was far better!
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- Re: Starman isn't a bad SF film, in spite of its somewhat predictable melodramatic elements, ... - patrickU 09:03:29 03/18/05 (11)
- Re: Starman isn't a bad SF film, in spite of its somewhat predictable melodramatic elements, ... - rico 10:38:06 03/18/05 (5)
- Re: Starman isn't a bad SF film, in spite of its somewhat predictable melodramatic elements, ... - patrickU 11:38:02 03/18/05 (3)
- "But he state that Carpenter film was excellent, and THAT was my point." -LOL! Well heck, ... - Audiophilander 12:50:54 03/18/05 (2)
- Re: What did you read? nt - patrickU 13:13:16 03/18/05 (1)
- Clue #1: The fact that I stated John Carpenter's The Thing was excellent is one of MY points; not your's (get it?)! - Audiophilander 23:52:17 03/18/05 (0)
- Thanks Rico! - Audiophilander 10:57:28 03/18/05 (0)
- No offense, but other than providing another uninformed opinion, you know little of what you speak. - Audiophilander 10:36:11 03/18/05 (4)
- Re: No offense, BUT how can one use so many words for saying nothing, beside trying to... - patrickU 11:34:06 03/18/05 (3)
- LOL! I neither subscribe to the NY Times On-line nor your's & Vinnie Canby's grey poupon views anytime. - Audiophilander 12:41:21 03/18/05 (2)
- Re: Don´t be childish.... - patrickU 13:23:21 03/18/05 (1)
- I wouldn't dare intrude upon your domain. (nt) - Audiophilander 23:47:13 03/18/05 (0)