In Reply to: Re: Starman isn't a bad SF film, in spite of its somewhat predictable melodramatic elements, ... posted by rico on March 18, 2005 at 10:38:06:
That was not only this one point! As I did nor read the novel, I could say nothing about this. But he state that Carpenter film was excellent, and THAT was my point.
Is his right?
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- Re: Starman isn't a bad SF film, in spite of its somewhat predictable melodramatic elements, ... - patrickU 11:38:02 03/18/05 (3)
- "But he state that Carpenter film was excellent, and THAT was my point." -LOL! Well heck, ... - Audiophilander 12:50:54 03/18/05 (2)
- Re: What did you read? nt - patrickU 13:13:16 03/18/05 (1)
- Clue #1: The fact that I stated John Carpenter's The Thing was excellent is one of MY points; not your's (get it?)! - Audiophilander 23:52:17 03/18/05 (0)