In Reply to: Re: Starman isn't a bad SF film, in spite of its somewhat predictable melodramatic elements, ... posted by patrickU on March 18, 2005 at 09:03:29:
I agree but his point is that Carpenter's is closer to the original story.
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- Re: Starman isn't a bad SF film, in spite of its somewhat predictable melodramatic elements, ... - rico 10:38:06 03/18/05 (5)
- Re: Starman isn't a bad SF film, in spite of its somewhat predictable melodramatic elements, ... - patrickU 11:38:02 03/18/05 (3)
- "But he state that Carpenter film was excellent, and THAT was my point." -LOL! Well heck, ... - Audiophilander 12:50:54 03/18/05 (2)
- Re: What did you read? nt - patrickU 13:13:16 03/18/05 (1)
- Clue #1: The fact that I stated John Carpenter's The Thing was excellent is one of MY points; not your's (get it?)! - Audiophilander 23:52:17 03/18/05 (0)
- Thanks Rico! - Audiophilander 10:57:28 03/18/05 (0)