In Reply to: Scientists respond to An Inconvenient Truth posted by clarkjohnsen on June 15, 2006 at 09:28:21:
and I'll give you a hundred bucks! (Hint: you'll never find one, 'cause it don't exist).This is nothing but political posturing and belly-aching from people who refuse to face the facts.
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- Clark, show me an article with a similar point of view from a peer-reviewed scientific journal of repute... - C.B. 09:42:15 06/16/06 (26)
- Cilmate Research is a respected, peer-reviewed journal. And surprise, surprise! - clarkjohnsen 13:24:48 06/16/06 (8)
- Here's a critque of the Soon and Baliunas article in Scientific American... - C.B. 14:20:06 06/16/06 (6)
- Like I said, watching you weasel is almost worth having you renege on your debt. - clarkjohnsen 08:43:06 06/17/06 (0)
- Perhaps I should have said "peer reviewed and accepted by Al Gore" - Victor Khomenko 15:00:30 06/16/06 (4)
- He's trying to weasel out! Watch him squirm. nt - clarkjohnsen 08:44:47 06/17/06 (0)
- Perhaps you should stick to games where they let you on the playing field. - late 15:25:35 06/16/06 (2)
- So belittling a person you are... I had almost forgotten. nt - clarkjohnsen 08:55:28 06/17/06 (1)
- It's an obvious truth, they wouldn't hand you a scapel and let you do brain surgery. For the same reason ..nt - late 12:48:22 06/17/06 (0)
- I will see your 1K study and raise you a 500K study, plus 900 more right behind it ..nt - late 14:01:25 06/16/06 (0)
- Ok, how about this - rnhood 13:02:30 06/16/06 (2)
- They don't want to hear it -- and it ain't *peer reviewed*. Because you see, with "peer review"... - clarkjohnsen 13:35:03 06/16/06 (1)
- Tautological you are, ain´t ya? And playing cheap sophistry, as usual...(nt) - orejones 04:47:51 06/17/06 (0)
- What do you think the chances of publishing such work today are, in the current hysterical climate (pun...)? - Victor Khomenko 09:58:04 06/16/06 (13)
- Weak argument... - C.B. 10:25:31 06/16/06 (12)
- "Science is always open to opposing opinions" Lysenko lives! - Victor Khomenko 10:36:26 06/16/06 (11)
- So are you equating current consensus thinking on climate change with Lysenko's "theory" of genetics? (nt) - C.B. 11:25:22 06/16/06 (10)
- Why not? You don't see the current climate of intolerance? Just the matter of degree - Victor Khomenko 11:30:01 06/16/06 (9)
- Darwinists are the same damn way! Chalk it up to insecurity. nt - clarkjohnsen 13:37:17 06/16/06 (7)
- Insecurity you said? You, the shakiest guy posting here...? Pffftttt...!! (nt) - orejones 04:50:25 06/17/06 (3)
- Great demo... thanks! - Victor Khomenko 06:57:31 06/17/06 (2)
- You can always count on that guy to serve as his own worst example. nt - clarkjohnsen 08:57:30 06/17/06 (1)
- So old Miss Manners, the dry spinster, spoketh... (nt) - orejones 11:21:25 06/17/06 (0)
- beautiful transition- time to argue evolution and let's also throw in abortion (NT) - tunenut 19:15:21 06/16/06 (0)
- You telling me? They come from the same Church of Fanatical Persecution - Victor Khomenko 13:58:59 06/16/06 (1)
- So.. you took a middle ground after reading that old scientist. Have you swung back to kooky territory again? ..nt - late 14:07:21 06/16/06 (0)
- A matter of degree - late 11:35:55 06/16/06 (0)