In Reply to: But the USA elects a king every 4 years posted by dave c on August 29, 2007 at 18:50:50:
"THe black population of Britain has only really been statistically significant for 50 years."
Let's not forget that until the mid 60's, a scant forty years ago, black people's right to vote was somewhat limited in the South. It was not that long ago racial murders were taking place.
"But the USA elects a king every 4 years"
Elect is the operative word here.
"Systems that elect parliaments to rule are closer to democracy than presidential ones, in my opinion."
With the major distinction being that the Prime Minister is not elected by the people, but rather by the representatives the people elect. Sort of like Congress electing the President.
"Monarchy does not actually necessitate an inherited title."
I am not sure what you mean here.
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- RE: But the USA elects a king every 4 years - jamesgarvin 07:00:24 08/30/07 (2)
- The rule of one - dave c 13:34:31 08/30/07 (0)
- "Elect is the operative word here." I´d rather say "The USA is bought a king every 4 years" (nt) - orejones 10:42:31 08/30/07 (0)