In Reply to: Knock ytourself out.. posted by Analog Scott on September 6, 2007 at 10:14:23:
And FWIW I'm not keeping records, I am causing them to be kept and not erased.
"Where did I claim they were actually under age?" Why, right here: "Your comment about undrage girls..."
http://www.videoasylum.com/films/messages/5/57430.html
Unless I misinterpret "undrage", you were the one who used the word first. I merely commented that the high-school girls portrayed in the film, actresses all, were great looking. At any rate, as you were already informed, a girl has to be under 16 to be "underage" in any state, and clearly these girls were HS seniors, probably played by actresses in their early twenties.
So which is it? "Stupidity or intelectual dishonesty?" In your case I'll go for the third choice: blinding, irrational animus.
clark
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- "God you really are an idiot." Another good one to keep on the record. - clarkjohnsen 13:00:02 09/06/07 (10)
- Just when I think you have hit bottom on the creepy scale - Analog Scott 20:47:10 09/06/07 (0)
- Geez.... - afilado 15:34:07 09/06/07 (8)
- How 'bout: "You stuck your pointy nose in this."nt - jamesgarvin 16:56:06 09/06/07 (2)
- The man (?) is clearly a pill. (Nice quote captures!) nt - clarkjohnsen 07:32:37 09/07/07 (1)
- How can both you guys be lapdogs at the same time... - afilado 10:29:16 09/07/07 (0)
- Or these: "If you want to engage me in any respect having to do with film, let's go. Otherwise, butt out"nt - jamesgarvin 16:53:57 09/06/07 (0)
- "Who wrote these words: Where did you come from? You want to talk about film or fight? "nt - jamesgarvin 16:52:29 09/06/07 (3)
- LOL!! Catch your breath, man. (nt) - afilado 19:57:02 09/06/07 (2)
- Actually, you make it soooo easy.nt - jamesgarvin 09:52:55 09/07/07 (1)
- Otherwise, and you couldn't participate.....(nt) - afilado 10:26:11 09/07/07 (0)