In Reply to: Dude i called you on your lust for young ladies that were well portrayed as under age posted by Analog Scott on September 6, 2007 at 10:00:32:
the girls portrayed were just graduating from high school, which normally would make them eighteen years of age. Now, I realize that is young, but it doesn't make them underage. Please explain.
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- I don't get it - Albert B. Broman 20:16:43 09/06/07 (10)
- Quite right. He only wants to badger me and the facts be damned. nt - clarkjohnsen 07:37:07 09/07/07 (0)
- RE: I don't get it - Analog Scott 21:43:30 09/06/07 (8)
- "when I graduated less than half my class had turned 18"...when did you graduate?....I graduated from HS in... - TWB 12:48:58 09/09/07 (1)
- Relevance? nt - Analog Scott 11:20:33 09/11/07 (0)
- RE: I don't get it - Albert B. Broman 17:18:28 09/07/07 (5)
- What is your point? - Analog Scott 20:38:25 09/07/07 (4)
- RE: What is your point? - Albert B. Broman 09:11:13 09/08/07 (3)
- That is your point? - Analog Scott 16:56:28 09/08/07 (0)
- "You are worried about some virginal purity..." No, all he's worried about is... - clarkjohnsen 10:32:18 09/08/07 (1)
- Dude, seriously, get a life - Analog Scott 17:01:39 09/08/07 (0)