In Reply to: I can appreciate your admiration of his work, posted by tinear on December 4, 2008 at 12:01:25:
Not particularly. And I prefer Haneke of the two.I was saying I am open to expanding my understanding of art as a reflection of personal nature, even deeper perversity. I don't run away from it because it is difficult. I take Noe at his word that he is seriously exploring, in his own way, the same territory as Haneke - contemporary human condition.
Is Noe's butcher any more repellent than the monster in Vampyr, which I've seen you praise here? What is your standard of sympathy/antipathy for film? Mine is: Is the tale well told? I don't avoid art/film because I fear it will reduce me by raising problematic emotions. Quite the contrary.
Your Holocaust remarks notwithstanding, of course you know there is ample legitimate evidence to support a contention that you have it in you to perform the most heinous acts given conducive personal circumstances. That is precisely the case that both Noe and Haneke are making.
Edits: 12/04/08 12/04/08
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- I didn't say I admired his work... - afilado 14:53:57 12/04/08 (3)
- I think you hit upon it. Haneke appears to try, in his editing, - tinear 15:39:51 12/04/08 (2)
- Real people do real violence ...... - afilado 17:31:07 12/04/08 (1)
- If Hirst were Noe he'd throw people into the live shark's aquarium and THEN - tinear 22:41:02 12/04/08 (0)