In Reply to: I didn't say I admired his work... posted by afilado on December 4, 2008 at 14:53:57:
to give a reason whereas Noe just depicts incredible violence and hatred. We sit and watch, like some spectator outside numbly watching and not interceding in some prolonged violent assault.
We all know the depths of human behavior, we have seen it. Merely to show it, therefore, isn't intellectually rigorous, demanding. It is easy. I'd argue art never can be. Noe's films don't challenge the viewer, unless it is to sit still for the visual assault. We are victimized as much as the character and I, frankly, don' like the feeling.
"Vamypr" is highly stylized and the violence serves the purpose of the story. All crimes are different and, yet, the same. Noe only shows the latter fact.
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- I think you hit upon it. Haneke appears to try, in his editing, - tinear 15:39:51 12/04/08 (2)
- Real people do real violence ...... - afilado 17:31:07 12/04/08 (1)
- If Hirst were Noe he'd throw people into the live shark's aquarium and THEN - tinear 22:41:02 12/04/08 (0)