In Reply to: The book's the thing....... posted by Bill McNeal on May 1, 2009 at 19:15:27:
While the book may be somewhat above the average pulp science fiction, it is still not something to take with you on that darn island.
One should not consider Tarkovsky' work as an extension of Lem's, for it simply borrows the rough sketch of the plot from it. The connection is that of the natural landscape to Monet painting. It is there, but how important it really is?
Which is not to suggest someone interested in that movie should not read the book - by all means he should. But Lem's work is aimed at teenager in us, not 13 yo, mind you , but still not an adult... and Tarkovsky addresses much higher level.
The 2001 is all phony, it is all about the wrapping, with no substance. So while always compared to Solaris, it is a totally different kind of a movie. Ditto for the Soderberg's work, which is just another take on the general approach of the 2001, albeit by an apprentice... like the 2001 or not, Kubrik is not your average master. Even his fluff is special.
Soderberg's film is basically a Reader's Digest version of War and Peace. The real work can be hard to dig through for some, but it is incredibly stimulating.
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- I disagree - Victor Khomenko 08:38:38 05/02/09 (15)
- RE: I disagree - Bill McNeal 07:53:48 05/03/09 (1)
- I said teenager in us - Victor Khomenko 09:18:44 05/03/09 (0)
- Maybe it's the translation, but I thought the 'Bergman does scifi' approach was laughable .nt - late 10:02:39 05/02/09 (12)
- Because it is not a sci-fi movie. - Victor Khomenko 10:19:11 05/02/09 (11)
- I'd kindly disagree. It IS a sci-fi film but so unlike others in the genre, - tinear 13:11:00 05/02/09 (9)
- I knew that statement was going to raise some eyebrow - Victor Khomenko 15:13:01 05/02/09 (8)
- Long movie.. they travel. They realise there is an alien. They get upset and leave. Deep .nt - late 07:38:58 05/07/09 (1)
- Sounds like - sjb 14:35:57 05/07/09 (0)
- Absolutely Sci-Fi ... - Dr Phibes 07:53:38 05/03/09 (1)
- The winner is: "Science fiction is anything published as science fiction." - Victor Khomenko 05:55:52 05/04/09 (0)
- Saw, "Ivan's Childhood," recently. A first film which could shame the films of many veteran - tinear 18:12:30 05/02/09 (3)
- You should love his Katok i Skripka (Steamroller and Violin) - Victor Khomenko 18:16:48 05/02/09 (2)
- I saw it some time ago and liked it. I wish he'd make some more films. :-( nt - tinear 07:50:29 05/04/09 (1)
- Yep... just 9 versus Kubrick's 12... OK, let's not argue about the count. nt - Victor Khomenko 08:31:37 05/04/09 (0)
- RE: Because it is not a sci-fi movie. - patrickU 11:24:49 05/02/09 (0)