In Reply to: Maybe it's the translation, but I thought the 'Bergman does scifi' approach was laughable .nt posted by late on May 2, 2009 at 10:02:39:
Approaching Solaris with such yardstick is surely going to create uncertainty, fear and dislike.
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- Because it is not a sci-fi movie. - Victor Khomenko 10:19:11 05/02/09 (11)
- I'd kindly disagree. It IS a sci-fi film but so unlike others in the genre, - tinear 13:11:00 05/02/09 (9)
- I knew that statement was going to raise some eyebrow - Victor Khomenko 15:13:01 05/02/09 (8)
- Long movie.. they travel. They realise there is an alien. They get upset and leave. Deep .nt - late 07:38:58 05/07/09 (1)
- Sounds like - sjb 14:35:57 05/07/09 (0)
- Absolutely Sci-Fi ... - Dr Phibes 07:53:38 05/03/09 (1)
- The winner is: "Science fiction is anything published as science fiction." - Victor Khomenko 05:55:52 05/04/09 (0)
- Saw, "Ivan's Childhood," recently. A first film which could shame the films of many veteran - tinear 18:12:30 05/02/09 (3)
- You should love his Katok i Skripka (Steamroller and Violin) - Victor Khomenko 18:16:48 05/02/09 (2)
- I saw it some time ago and liked it. I wish he'd make some more films. :-( nt - tinear 07:50:29 05/04/09 (1)
- Yep... just 9 versus Kubrick's 12... OK, let's not argue about the count. nt - Victor Khomenko 08:31:37 05/04/09 (0)
- RE: Because it is not a sci-fi movie. - patrickU 11:24:49 05/02/09 (0)