Topic - "Stalker:" no film ever has had three better actors. Still, with - tinear 13:31:07 04/04/11 (20)

• I now feel obligated to mentiion the Caligula - Victor Khomenko 18:29:50 04/05/11 (2)
• You had to put Mirren in, didn't you? Cheater!!!!!!!! nt - tinear 20:26:04 04/05/11 (1)
• She was lovely there, wasn't she? :) - Victor Khomenko 07:15:18 04/06/11 (0)
• Spartacus - DFaulds 09:39:45 04/05/11 (2)
• Or perhaps A Man for All Seasons - DFaulds 08:56:18 04/06/11 (1)
• Or The Train... or... :) There goes the thread!!! - Victor Khomenko 12:12:46 04/06/11 (0)
• RE: "Stalker:" no film ever has had three better actors. Still, with - grinagog 07:59:46 04/05/11 (1)
• NOT stars. Superb actors. There's a massive difference. nt - tinear 12:01:44 04/05/11 (0)
• GET REAL. * - mr grits 18:08:55 04/04/11 (0)
• No film has had three better actors? - semuta 13:57:04 04/04/11 (10)
• 'Julius Caesar' Brando, Mason, Gielgud. * - Tony D. 17:18:23 04/05/11 (0)
• Brando alone compares. The Hollywood and American Public acting preference is for - tinear 12:10:24 04/05/11 (3)
• Yes and no... - semuta 16:24:19 04/05/11 (0)
• Less is more... the RUSSIAN way - Victor Khomenko 13:30:32 04/05/11 (1)
• I like it. THIS is what those guys at Stalingrad must have been motivated by. nt - tinear 20:27:29 04/05/11 (0)
• 1 Pacino = .654 Solonitsyn - that's the official exchange rate - Victor Khomenko 07:33:05 04/05/11 (3)
• :-). The naturalness and intelligence of those three is astonishing. It's as if - tinear 12:05:11 04/05/11 (2)
• They are actors as opposed to stars - Victor Khomenko 13:26:56 04/05/11 (1)
• Duvall's been terrible for years. The man who elevated, "True Confessions," and "Lonesome - tinear 08:09:55 04/06/11 (0)
• Judgement at Nuremburg - Prisoners 15:59:42 04/04/11 (0)