In Reply to: "Stalker:" no film ever has had three better actors. Still, with posted by tinear on April 4, 2011 at 13:31:07:
Stalker for me it's always been Tarkovskys landscapes; the forests, the railway, the wrecked buildings, the abandoned military hardware, all seems to almost be from another planet... the very first interior shots of the Stalkers room; I've never seen a place like that anywhere + the snowbound bar where they return near the end of the film is as bleak as any interior ever filmed The place is as much of a star as the players I agree they're good; Stalker isn't "easy watching" just like Mahler isn't "easy listening" but it's worth the trip
As for films with lots of Stars in 1 place: Mamet's Glengarry, Glen Ross: Jack Lemmon, Al Pacino, Kevin Spacey, Alan Arkin, Alec Baldwin, Ed Harris
GW
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- RE: "Stalker:" no film ever has had three better actors. Still, with - grinagog 07:59:46 04/05/11 (1)
- NOT stars. Superb actors. There's a massive difference. nt - tinear 12:01:44 04/05/11 (0)