In Reply to: Couldn't agree more . . . posted by mr grits on July 5, 2012 at 12:47:53:
...the only reason he was in films is because he had a certain "look" which was popular in the 50's.
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- RE: Yes, James Dean had zero talent - KLechterO78s 15:24:39 07/06/12 (0)