In Reply to: small error and bigger corrections posted by Ole Lund Christensen on December 6, 2007 at 11:58:46:
It was not intentional. If it was intentional, I would have called you Ole Lund Cheerleader, which is more fitting :-)
>>When I post a link, even without any comments from me, the attacks starts from all the hidden HD DVD fanboys here.<<
See, this is the crux of the issue. You have a clearly-demonstrated bias, and an obvious agenda. You post a lot of data to support your agenda, and much of it is very biased. Given your bias and agenda, you don't have to post any comments for people to know that you are cheerleading.
To further cause issues, you accuse anyone who does not agree with your agenda or care for the biased way in which you promote it, of being a "hidden HD DVD fanboy." That's the trouble with you fanboys - you get so blinded by your biases that you think everyone else is equally as biased as you.
>>Do also notice that I use my real name, in the tradition of the Danish Knight Holger Danske<<
Actually, I don't really care what you call yourself. If we were engaged in a business transaction, your real name would matter to me. Here, it really doesn't matter.
>>Therefore I am happy to have much better mealtickets than promoting Blu Ray, I am one of the highest paid loudspeaker engineers in Europe, and my clients pay luxery hotels for me.<<
Gee, I'm just soooo happy for you. I'm one of the highest paid business/technology consultants in my industry, and I stay in luxury hotels too :-) We're great people, you and I :-) However, unlike you I don't feel the need to parade my professional credentials to bolster my opinions.
>> simply do NOT read my posts, if you do not like them.<<
I'll offer you the same benefit - do not read my replies, if you do not like them.
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- Sorry for misspelling your moniker - racerguy 12:23:33 12/06/07 (23)
- RE: Sorry for misspelling your moniker - Jazz Inmate 13:40:15 12/06/07 (19)
- "You mistake an informed decision..." - ...INFORMED DECISION!!! - Really, informed by what? Oh, wait a minute: - Audiophilander 08:07:17 12/07/07 (2)
- You chose a format that has 20 GB less capacity and can't even accommodate 5.1 lossless PCM with - Jazz Inmate 09:35:24 12/07/07 (1)
- You're the feller getting the "chip implant" like Clockwork from the Blue authority: - Audiophilander 12:16:16 12/07/07 (0)
- "gloating" was the word I was looking for, Ole "gloats". - Duilawyer 19:00:02 12/06/07 (11)
- Ole's not "politically correct". He has (correctly) identified the superior format and makes no bones about it - Jazz Inmate 19:30:52 12/06/07 (10)
- Unfortunately, Blu-ray sales advantages have more to do with studio support and PS3s.... - oscar 20:14:05 12/06/07 (9)
- well stated analysis - Ole Lund Christensen 22:31:57 12/06/07 (8)
- Have you read this Businessweek tidbit concerning Warner ? - oscar 06:24:31 12/07/07 (7)
- Very informative, thank you - Ole Lund Christensen 14:10:59 12/07/07 (0)
- High Def will go as Warner goes. - Jack G 09:47:24 12/07/07 (4)
- I don't see Sony/Disney/Fox defecting no matter what Warner's does. - oscar 10:04:58 12/07/07 (3)
- I disagree - Jack G 10:41:20 12/07/07 (2)
- The Blu-ray studios like BD+/region coding as well as the bandwidth/storage advantages. - oscar 11:23:00 12/07/07 (1)
- Aren't these the same studios that supported DIVX for many of the same reasons? - Jack G 12:02:30 12/07/07 (0)
- That would be awesome NT - Jazz Inmate 09:05:55 12/07/07 (0)
- that's where you go wrong, big time, You confuse Ole's right to choose - Duilawyer 14:12:03 12/06/07 (3)
- Nonsense...when Jack finds a juicy news item in support of HD DVD, no one attacks him for it - Jazz Inmate 14:22:41 12/06/07 (2)
- you are right! I think becuae there is balance in Jacks posts. - Duilawyer 16:25:15 12/06/07 (0)
- That's not true - you do (nt) - racerguy 14:37:25 12/06/07 (0)
- Well said. (nt) - Jack G 13:27:07 12/06/07 (0)
- RE: Sorry for misspelling your moniker - Ole Lund Christensen 13:13:39 12/06/07 (0)
- Nicely stated, and I concur. (nt) - Audiophilander 13:05:35 12/06/07 (0)