In Reply to: "gloating" was the word I was looking for, Ole "gloats". posted by Duilawyer on December 6, 2007 at 19:00:02:
What's the fascination with pretending two formats that differ by 20 gigs in their capacity are equal...and then pretending people who correctly identify the differences--including the higher sales of blu-ray--are "biased" or "gloating".
In forums where you're supposed to share and discuss information, the key is the information. As long as it's correct, that should be all that matters.
-------------"I have found that if you love life, life will love you back." -Arthur Rubinstein (1887-1982)
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- Ole's not "politically correct". He has (correctly) identified the superior format and makes no bones about it - Jazz Inmate 19:30:52 12/06/07 (10)
- Unfortunately, Blu-ray sales advantages have more to do with studio support and PS3s.... - oscar 20:14:05 12/06/07 (9)
- well stated analysis - Ole Lund Christensen 22:31:57 12/06/07 (8)
- Have you read this Businessweek tidbit concerning Warner ? - oscar 06:24:31 12/07/07 (7)
- Very informative, thank you - Ole Lund Christensen 14:10:59 12/07/07 (0)
- High Def will go as Warner goes. - Jack G 09:47:24 12/07/07 (4)
- I don't see Sony/Disney/Fox defecting no matter what Warner's does. - oscar 10:04:58 12/07/07 (3)
- I disagree - Jack G 10:41:20 12/07/07 (2)
- The Blu-ray studios like BD+/region coding as well as the bandwidth/storage advantages. - oscar 11:23:00 12/07/07 (1)
- Aren't these the same studios that supported DIVX for many of the same reasons? - Jack G 12:02:30 12/07/07 (0)
- That would be awesome NT - Jazz Inmate 09:05:55 12/07/07 (0)