In Reply to: Sorry for misspelling your moniker posted by racerguy on December 6, 2007 at 12:23:33:
>> See, this is the crux of the issue. You have a clearly-demonstrated bias, and an obvious agenda. <<
This is where you equal opportunity adopters lose your marbles. You mistake an informed decision to adopt the better format with "bias". Being open-minded doesn't mean that you forget about critical format specs like capacity, nor that you pretend it doesn't matter. That is not open minded. That is empty-headed. You masquerade your failure to understand the superiority of one format as being "unbiased" when in fact, by ignoring capacity you are showing much bias.
>> You post a lot of data to support your agenda, and much of it is very biased. <<
Much of it is sales figures that are verifiable and easy to prove wrong if incorrect. But the fact is they are correct.
-------------"I have found that if you love life, life will love you back." -Arthur Rubinstein (1887-1982)
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- RE: Sorry for misspelling your moniker - Jazz Inmate 13:40:15 12/06/07 (19)
- "You mistake an informed decision..." - ...INFORMED DECISION!!! - Really, informed by what? Oh, wait a minute: - Audiophilander 08:07:17 12/07/07 (2)
- You chose a format that has 20 GB less capacity and can't even accommodate 5.1 lossless PCM with - Jazz Inmate 09:35:24 12/07/07 (1)
- You're the feller getting the "chip implant" like Clockwork from the Blue authority: - Audiophilander 12:16:16 12/07/07 (0)
- "gloating" was the word I was looking for, Ole "gloats". - Duilawyer 19:00:02 12/06/07 (11)
- Ole's not "politically correct". He has (correctly) identified the superior format and makes no bones about it - Jazz Inmate 19:30:52 12/06/07 (10)
- Unfortunately, Blu-ray sales advantages have more to do with studio support and PS3s.... - oscar 20:14:05 12/06/07 (9)
- well stated analysis - Ole Lund Christensen 22:31:57 12/06/07 (8)
- Have you read this Businessweek tidbit concerning Warner ? - oscar 06:24:31 12/07/07 (7)
- Very informative, thank you - Ole Lund Christensen 14:10:59 12/07/07 (0)
- High Def will go as Warner goes. - Jack G 09:47:24 12/07/07 (4)
- I don't see Sony/Disney/Fox defecting no matter what Warner's does. - oscar 10:04:58 12/07/07 (3)
- I disagree - Jack G 10:41:20 12/07/07 (2)
- The Blu-ray studios like BD+/region coding as well as the bandwidth/storage advantages. - oscar 11:23:00 12/07/07 (1)
- Aren't these the same studios that supported DIVX for many of the same reasons? - Jack G 12:02:30 12/07/07 (0)
- That would be awesome NT - Jazz Inmate 09:05:55 12/07/07 (0)
- that's where you go wrong, big time, You confuse Ole's right to choose - Duilawyer 14:12:03 12/06/07 (3)
- Nonsense...when Jack finds a juicy news item in support of HD DVD, no one attacks him for it - Jazz Inmate 14:22:41 12/06/07 (2)
- you are right! I think becuae there is balance in Jacks posts. - Duilawyer 16:25:15 12/06/07 (0)
- That's not true - you do (nt) - racerguy 14:37:25 12/06/07 (0)