|
Video Asylum TVs, VCRs, DVD players, Home Theater systems and more. |
|
|
|
Video Asylum TVs, VCRs, DVD players, Home Theater systems and more. |
|
In Reply to: Try rereading JoeLipp's post posted by Jazz Inmate on January 6, 2008 at 12:47:51:
>>>The post you replied to did indeed suggest that Blu-ray was no great shakes compared to DVD and you said absolutely nothing to indicate that you don't share that position.<<<
I wrote this "My experience has been that while my BDs look better than DVDs, most are only about average by HD standards."
I don't know how you can interpret that as you did.
>>>Why you hold Blu-ray to bizarre standards remains a mystery to me.<<<
So, you think I should hold them to DVD standards instead? BTW, its the same standards I hold HD DVDs too.
>>>f your goal is to have every speck of film grain removed using posproduction techniques so that HD content on blu-ray all looks homogeneous regardless of source material, we're going to have to agree to disagree on that.<<<
That's the second time you have accused me of that. I have no idea where you get that from.
Do you honestly believe that all transfers and compressions for BD are equal and perfect?
Jack
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- RE: Try rereading JoeLipp's post - Jack G 13:02:55 01/06/08 (6)
- I didn't get from your post that "only average HD" was a significant improvement - Jazz Inmate 13:25:28 01/06/08 (5)
- We are more or less in agreement - Jack G 13:47:26 01/06/08 (4)
- "I hold HD, all formats to a higher standard... and I expect them to deliver...." - oscar 19:47:49 01/06/08 (2)
- Thank you - Jack G 05:10:17 01/07/08 (0)
- yeah, but after about 60 yrs of NTSC, HD seems like a godsend NT - Jazz Inmate 22:21:35 01/06/08 (0)
- RE: We are more or less in agreement - Jazz Inmate 15:20:00 01/06/08 (0)
Top of Page ]
[ Contact Us ]
[ Support/Wish List ]
[ Copyright © 2024, Audio Asylum, all rights reserved ]
