In Reply to: RE: Try rereading JoeLipp's post posted by Jack G on January 6, 2008 at 13:02:55:
If you mean that "only average HD" is pretty darn detailed and spectacular, we are in agreement, but the adverb-adjective description of "only average" doesn't usually indicate quality. It seems to me that you are hypercritical of Blu-ray and have preconditioned yourself to be unhappy with the format. But the same can be said of most folks who hang out at AVS.
-------------"I have found that if you love life, life will love you back." -Arthur Rubinstein (1887-1982)
Edits: 01/06/08
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- I didn't get from your post that "only average HD" was a significant improvement - Jazz Inmate 13:25:28 01/06/08 (5)
- We are more or less in agreement - Jack G 13:47:26 01/06/08 (4)
- "I hold HD, all formats to a higher standard... and I expect them to deliver...." - oscar 19:47:49 01/06/08 (2)
- Thank you - Jack G 05:10:17 01/07/08 (0)
- yeah, but after about 60 yrs of NTSC, HD seems like a godsend NT - Jazz Inmate 22:21:35 01/06/08 (0)
- RE: We are more or less in agreement - Jazz Inmate 15:20:00 01/06/08 (0)