I guess you didn't want to hear about her reaction from my lips, so I asked my wife to write me about her impressions - after all it was she who suffered more from it - and so she did.So, there goes... another pin into Lord.
Here is what I think about Lord of the Rings:The reasons making me have kept my eyes open while you were peacefully snoring Saturday, were pretty simple - I wanted to see what kept Gregory riveted to our downstairs screen for 6 hours. While he was watching it, and I took an occasional peak and heard loud noises coming up from under the kitchen floor, I thought that perhaps it was like classical music to a person who only heard sounds of tam-tam his whole life - just cacophony for the unenlightened, and if I sat down and sank into the world full of fantasy and poetry - I would love it.
You know how much I love symbolism and its traces in poetry and paintings...I was dreaming of a recreation of Iceland's sagas, Kalevala, Nibelungs... Ibsenasque lofty ideas... you get the picture.
I caught "Lord of the Rings" from the middle and decided to stay put to get the taste of it. "It is OK even if I do not get the hang of the plot, I can always watch the whole series later... I will just plunge in my favorite world of fantasies at least for a while!"
I was watching it... and watching and watching... and the more I watched it, the more disappointed I became. To begin with, maybe I should have not had any expectations of "recreating" something as elusive as the spirit of symbolism... It is also true, that perhaps Tolkien had nothing to do with the whole idea of symbolism. I regretted that I did not read him and was unable to judge the movie from a standpoint of at least accurately conveying the spirit of the original. Alas!
However, viewing it as an independent creation I could not help, but feel betrayed in my expectations. To start with, it smelt and breath of "computerized" images. The pallet was extremely primitive and garish. There were no "tints" or "half tones" - just all the colors one's simple mind, unburdened by such trivial things as harmony, discreteness of means - simple taste, can imagine. I think the task for the artist was not to leave any color unused and he performed that brilliantly!
The graphic, although showing some width of imagination, also struck me as primitive and devoid of one thing that makes one look for hours at seascapes of Reuisdal or works of Turner, or De Chirico or Hopper - namely ART. It was craft - pure and simple.
I can guess that at one point the creators wanted me to see heavenly landscape. For that noble task they brought forth everything they could dream about to make me see the paradise - mountains, creeks, pavilion in a weird mixture of styles and angelic faces of the main characters - the boy, the wise man, etc. (pardon me for not knowing the names of the characters - but I only watched it for half an hour)
I cannot add anything to this. I am sure you understand what I wanted to say.The sound "artist" cooperated nicely with the visual effects one. And what soundtrack it was! The director at appointed places wanted me to feel horror, apprehension, delight, relief, etc. For that he used incessant "sound effects", which will probably win yet another Oscar, but will still stay what they were - not music, but "EFFECTS." Did they make me feel horrified, apprehensive, delighted, relieved - not in the least...
I could write much more about it, but feel that it would be grossly unfair to do so without watching the whole movie (or at least one of them, for I am not sure I will be able to sit through the whole creation.) I know, I know you will tell me (and I agree) that in most cases it is enough to watch just a small part in order to be able to judge the whole thing. Nonetheless, I did not say anything about actors' contribution and therefore, feel guilty.
I cannot wait to rent the first part and sit patiently through it. Then, maybe, my harsh opinion of it would be more justified or (I have a futile hope) contradicted.
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Topic - OK, AuPh, you asked for it, so my wife speaks of LOTR - Victor Khomenko 12:41:45 01/27/04 (64)
- So much thought being wasted on this children's sword and sorcery fantasy.... - Dalton 18:27:11 01/28/04 (27)
- Re: So much thought being wasted on this children's sword and sorcery fantasy.... - patrickU 01:38:38 01/29/04 (26)
- Good example: I've seen both The Seven Samurai & The Magnificent Seven, the American west version. - Audiophilander 08:05:09 01/29/04 (25)
- Re: NO NO AND NO! - patrickU 08:52:21 01/29/04 (9)
- Should I put my affairs in order? - Audiophilander 09:41:59 01/29/04 (8)
- Re:Yes, you are a deseperated case..Time to say good bye.... - patrickU 10:31:14 01/29/04 (0)
- That is easy - Victor Khomenko 09:51:14 01/29/04 (6)
- Re: That is easy / Victor.... - patrickU 10:33:36 01/29/04 (0)
- Bogus argument, and here's why: - Audiophilander 10:06:16 01/29/04 (4)
- Re: And WHY one may ask you did NOT ????? nt - patrickU 10:35:43 01/29/04 (3)
- Because my katana became dull just being in the same room Seven Samurai was showing! (nt) - Audiophilander 12:47:15 01/29/04 (2)
- Re: Send it over to me.... - patrickU 13:10:22 01/29/04 (1)
- Sorry, Mssr. Guillotine, but... - Audiophilander 22:03:15 01/29/04 (0)
- Re: Good example: I've seen both The Seven Samurai & The Magnificent Seven, the American west version. - Victor Khomenko 08:17:41 01/29/04 (14)
- "She got bored with it..." - Tokien's LoTR novels may take a lot more work than some folks are willing to commit. - Audiophilander 08:47:22 01/29/04 (13)
- Dodging the point - Victor Khomenko 08:52:10 01/29/04 (12)
- "It is commonly called a children's book..." - By whom? You, perhaps? Now THAT's an unbiased source. LOL! - Audiophilander 10:35:19 01/29/04 (11)
- Now you are sliding completely - Victor Khomenko 11:21:35 01/29/04 (10)
- Re: W & P and..LOTR..... - patrickU 13:42:34 01/29/04 (2)
- But you are forgetting the target audience... - Victor Khomenko 13:46:02 01/29/04 (1)
- No, the "target audience" (i.e., folks of all ages who still have a sense of wonder) has forgotten you! (nt) - Audiophilander 21:59:16 01/29/04 (0)
- That's because I'm pullin' on one end of the rope while you're on the other goin' under for the 30th time! - Audiophilander 12:29:46 01/29/04 (6)
- LOL! That sez plenty of those "young adults" - Victor Khomenko 12:41:45 01/29/04 (5)
- "I didn't say anything about their age, ..." - Now that's a weaselly response if ever I read one. - Audiophilander 13:19:01 01/29/04 (4)
- Your mama should have taught you... - Victor Khomenko 13:43:04 01/29/04 (3)
- The irony of your making ... - Audiophilander 15:58:04 01/29/04 (2)
- Re: The irony of your making ... - Victor Khomenko 16:20:18 01/29/04 (1)
- Object away, the LoTR films & books are neither naive, poorly made, nor, strictly speaking, a children's opus. - Audiophilander 17:14:15 01/29/04 (0)
- I'm assuming that your wife watched a snippet of The Two Towers, since she mentioned joining the film in the middle; ... - Audiophilander 16:45:50 01/27/04 (35)
- No mud, no wrestling, but lots of words ...! (Long!) - Roxanne 21:13:23 01/27/04 (34)
- No mud, and brief - Victor Khomenko 08:42:09 01/28/04 (33)
- LOTR has so much merit as.... - patrickU 00:12:12 01/29/04 (2)
- The torture continues - Victor Khomenko 06:11:46 01/29/04 (1)
- Re: Darling Clueless.... - patrickU 06:35:04 01/29/04 (0)
- Re: No mud, and brief - Roxanne 14:41:23 01/28/04 (5)
- Re: No mud, and brief - Anya Khomenko 07:31:39 01/29/04 (0)
- Re: No mud, and brief - Victor Khomenko 06:24:55 01/29/04 (3)
- Re: No mud, and brief - patrickU 06:48:21 01/29/04 (2)
- Re: No mud, and brief - Victor Khomenko 06:56:04 01/29/04 (1)
- Re: No mud, and brief - patrickU 06:58:30 01/29/04 (0)
- Re: Victor the gentleman. nt - patrickU 08:44:57 01/28/04 (23)
- Yes, but he wasn't holding the door open for you! (nt) - Audiophilander 09:14:14 01/28/04 (22)
- Re: YOU again! nt - patrickU 09:42:24 01/28/04 (21)
- Yep! - Audiophilander 11:50:37 01/28/04 (20)
- Re: Yep! - patrickU 01:26:53 01/29/04 (11)
- "Hollywood do makes movies for profit only (99%) others makes them for artistic values..." - LOL! - Audiophilander 09:51:17 01/29/04 (10)
- Re: That is censorship! If you cite, do it with the full text! - patrickU 10:42:01 01/29/04 (0)
- The old and tired America-centric view point - Victor Khomenko 10:11:45 01/29/04 (8)
- "America has it's unique taste, and we should admit, in many areas it is not the best." - Audiophilander 11:34:29 01/29/04 (7)
- You are again confusing the revenues with quality - Victor Khomenko 12:06:41 01/29/04 (6)
- "...what sells most is usually not what is synonimous with high quality." - LOL! - Audiophilander 17:28:12 01/29/04 (5)
- Thank you for making it clear... - Victor Khomenko 17:32:16 01/29/04 (4)
- Re: Victor you have been so deliciously slow..... - patrickU 06:05:54 01/30/04 (2)
- I am sure it will collect huge crowds - another great achievement in the world of cinema! - Victor Khomenko 06:23:52 01/30/04 (1)
- Re: I am sure it will collect huge crowds - another great achievement in the world of cinema! - Audiophilander 10:13:29 01/30/04 (0)
- Wow! So, the game gets a little rough and now you wanna take your bats and go home, right? - Audiophilander 23:20:33 01/29/04 (0)
- Re: Yep! - Roxanne 14:45:54 01/28/04 (7)
- Re: ::::......Go to sleep and wake up when the end credits roll... - patrickU 01:29:44 01/29/04 (5)
- Re: ::::......Go to sleep and wake up when the end credits roll... - Victor Khomenko 06:30:04 01/29/04 (4)
- Re: ::::......Go to sleep and wake up when the end credits roll... - patrickU 06:42:03 01/29/04 (3)
- LOL! I am sure she is! - Victor Khomenko 07:01:32 01/29/04 (2)
- Re: LOL! I am sure she is! - patrickU 07:12:19 01/29/04 (1)
- Re: LOL! I am sure she is! - Victor Khomenko 08:23:26 01/29/04 (0)
- Hee, hee, true enough; BTW, before Victor hops on the mustard issue, ...I prefer spicy to Grey Poupon! (nt) - Audiophilander 15:49:59 01/28/04 (0)