In Reply to: Your mama should have taught you... posted by Victor Khomenko on January 29, 2004 at 13:43:04:
...such a blatantly hypocritical statement should amuse even those who might agree completely with your rigidly inflexible and subjectively vapid viewpoint on LoTR; I'm genuiniely embarrassed for you Victor.>>> Your mama should've taught you that getting personal when you have nothing to answer with, is really bad form." <<<
Wha-? You're whining now because I indicate that you might be weaseling and calling you (i.e., but NOT name-calling) on something you clearly did through innuendo!
>>> "But I guess you still just don't get how much of your white underbelly you exposed with that silly "young adults" line?" <<<
LOL! Oh, I get it, you're having difficulty grasping the distinction! Well, I'm sorry if this plays havoc with your perceptions, but there is a verifiable difference between children's literature and that which is regarded appropriate for a young adult and adult market. If pressed I'll gladly point you to sites containing INFORMED opinions which concur with my own, but I'd rather not contribute further responsibility for raising your blood pressure (i.e., any more than has already apparently occured).
>>> "Speaks volumes." <<<
The Library of Congress couldn't spin you out of your LoTR malapropisms.
Regards,
AuPh
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- The irony of your making ... - Audiophilander 15:58:04 01/29/04 (2)
- Re: The irony of your making ... - Victor Khomenko 16:20:18 01/29/04 (1)
- Object away, the LoTR films & books are neither naive, poorly made, nor, strictly speaking, a children's opus. - Audiophilander 17:14:15 01/29/04 (0)