In Reply to: Re: patrick u - WTF? posted by patrickU on April 10, 2004 at 07:51:06:
Patrick - I'm sure that I'll benefit from your helpful observations concerning what I'm missing. But then again, who wouldn't want to be enlightened by someone who comes across with such arrogance and self-righteousness?
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- Re: patrick u - WTF? - Sean Jean 08:11:16 04/10/04 (24)
- Why do you bother - RGA 10:25:46 04/10/04 (3)
- Re: Why do you bother - Victor Khomenko 16:54:46 04/10/04 (1)
- Re: Why do you bother - RGA 18:35:23 04/11/04 (0)
- Re: Why do you bother - patrickU 10:37:00 04/10/04 (0)
- Re: patrick u - WTF? - patrickU 08:22:13 04/10/04 (9)
- Re: patrick u - WTF? - Analog Scott 08:47:11 04/10/04 (8)
- Re: patrick u - WTF? - Victor Khomenko 11:21:43 04/10/04 (5)
- Re: patrick u - WTF? - Analog Scott 11:48:52 04/10/04 (4)
- Re: patrick u - WTF? - Victor Khomenko 11:59:58 04/10/04 (3)
- Re: patrick u - WTF? - Analog Scott 12:07:41 04/10/04 (2)
- Re: patrick u - WTF? - Victor Khomenko 12:18:05 04/10/04 (1)
- Re: patrick u - WTF? - Analog Scott 12:29:51 04/10/04 (0)
- Re: patrick u - WTF? - patrickU 08:53:52 04/10/04 (1)
- Re: patrick u - WTF? - Analog Scott 12:19:33 04/10/04 (0)
- It´s something closer to a private joke than to a formal declaration, Sean... - orejones 08:16:44 04/10/04 (9)
- Re: It´s something closer to a private joke than to a formal declaration of war, Sean... - patrickU 08:24:04 04/10/04 (8)
- . . . . Concerning Patrick's contributions - Sean Jean 16:01:07 04/10/04 (7)
- Re: Theatre de l´absurde. - patrickU 02:16:35 04/11/04 (0)
- Re: . . . . Concerning Patrick's contributions - Victor Khomenko 16:43:47 04/10/04 (5)
- Re: . . . . Concerning Patrick's contributions - Sean Jean 19:12:32 04/10/04 (1)
- Re: . . . . Concerning Patrick's contributions - Victor Khomenko 20:21:24 04/10/04 (0)
- Re: . . . . Concerning Patrick's contributions - Analog Scott 19:12:10 04/10/04 (2)
- Re: The problem is... - patrickU 01:54:39 04/11/04 (1)
- Re: The problem is... - Analog Scott 09:20:18 04/11/04 (0)