In Reply to: Re: patrick u - WTF? posted by patrickU on April 10, 2004 at 08:22:13:
"No arrogance, just fun. May I suggest to read ( if of any interest ) the few words I wrote on this film.
Just make a search in case as I do not know the way to inclued in a link.
F*** is superfluous, Sean. "I took a look. What you said about the movie before has no more substance than what you have said in this thread. You say it lacks depth but fail to say how or why and you cite a modestly positive review as most representative of your view of the movie. Sean is right. You are setting yourself up as a standard for taste. Big mistake.
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- Re: patrick u - WTF? - Analog Scott 08:47:11 04/10/04 (8)
- Re: patrick u - WTF? - Victor Khomenko 11:21:43 04/10/04 (5)
- Re: patrick u - WTF? - Analog Scott 11:48:52 04/10/04 (4)
- Re: patrick u - WTF? - Victor Khomenko 11:59:58 04/10/04 (3)
- Re: patrick u - WTF? - Analog Scott 12:07:41 04/10/04 (2)
- Re: patrick u - WTF? - Victor Khomenko 12:18:05 04/10/04 (1)
- Re: patrick u - WTF? - Analog Scott 12:29:51 04/10/04 (0)
- Re: patrick u - WTF? - patrickU 08:53:52 04/10/04 (1)
- Re: patrick u - WTF? - Analog Scott 12:19:33 04/10/04 (0)