In Reply to: Not really sure what movie you saw posted by Analog Scott on September 17, 2005 at 08:18:47:
I hope you see this and the monastery hasn't revoked your keyboard privileges. I'll grant you hyperbole rights and try and take the rest of your post more seriously.
You seemed to miss the propaganda. All the buddies were shown to be shallow and realize their evil, sinful ways. You did stay awake that far, right?
And you did understand the basic premise that a guy healthily can function until the age of forty, though he has a powerful sex drive (you noticed the woody in the mornings, or did you think it was a backing up toilet that shot him in the face?) and DOESN'T masturbate, and will then find a babe waiting for him that finds such infantile behavior... appealing?
This movie didn't rise above sitcom humor, with the same jokes (such as those featured in the interchangeable scenes in the audio store) told over and over ad nauseum.
If it makes you think you have a future, I can see why you liked it so much. ;-)
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- Yeah, we saw different movies. "Bluest movies" you've ever seen? - tinear 14:50:13 09/17/05 (8)
- Re: Yeah, we saw different movies. "Bluest movies" you've ever seen? - Analog Scott 23:27:11 09/17/05 (7)
- Better buy Wedding Crashers: you'll love it! nt - tinear 04:52:53 09/21/05 (0)
- One point, again, is sufficient to show how wrong you are: - tinear 06:56:37 09/18/05 (5)
- Re: One point, again, is sufficient to show how wrong you are: - Analog Scott 08:22:44 09/18/05 (4)
- "How clueless does one have to be to come up with that ridiculous idea?" I believe... - clarkjohnsen 12:22:07 09/18/05 (1)
- Cwark, the 50-yr. old virgin, speaks. nt - tinear 13:10:23 09/18/05 (0)
- It's apparent to anyone reading these exchanges that a) you - tinear 10:56:57 09/18/05 (1)
- Disregard the above post. "Delete" doesn't seem to work. nt - tinear 11:06:45 09/18/05 (0)