In Reply to: Yeah, we saw different movies. "Bluest movies" you've ever seen? posted by tinear on September 17, 2005 at 14:50:13:
"I hope you see this and the monastery hasn't revoked your keyboard privileges. I'll grant you hyperbole rights and try and take the rest of your post more seriously."No hyperbole was used. Sorry, I don't watch porn. Just not my thing. As non-porn movies go this was one of the bluest movies I have ever seen.
"You seemed to miss the propaganda."
I think you are seeing propaganda that just isn't there.
" All the buddies were shown to be shallow and realize their evil, sinful ways. You did stay awake that far, right?"
I was awake throughout but the buddies were anything but shallow in so far as one can expect fom a sketch comedy oriented group of players. They were cartoonish but that comes with the territory.
"And you did understand the basic premise that a guy healthily can function until the age of forty, though he has a powerful sex drive (you noticed the woody in the mornings, or did you think it was a backing up toilet that shot him in the face?) and DOESN'T masturbate, and will then find a babe waiting for him that finds such infantile behavior... appealing?"
You are confusing a comic premise with a message. There in lies your problem. It was a comedy not a morality play."This movie didn't rise above sitcom humor, with the same jokes (such as those featured in the interchangeable scenes in the audio store) told over and over ad nauseum."
You are entitled to that opinion about the quality of humor. I disagree with it but the level of humor is subjective. As to the variety, you are simply mistaken. There were a wide range of jokes both stylistically and in subject matter."If it makes you think you have a future, I can see why you liked it so much. ;-)"
Now that was a crap joke. I see why you think it wasn't so good. ;-)
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- Re: Yeah, we saw different movies. "Bluest movies" you've ever seen? - Analog Scott 23:27:11 09/17/05 (7)
- Better buy Wedding Crashers: you'll love it! nt - tinear 04:52:53 09/21/05 (0)
- One point, again, is sufficient to show how wrong you are: - tinear 06:56:37 09/18/05 (5)
- Re: One point, again, is sufficient to show how wrong you are: - Analog Scott 08:22:44 09/18/05 (4)
- "How clueless does one have to be to come up with that ridiculous idea?" I believe... - clarkjohnsen 12:22:07 09/18/05 (1)
- Cwark, the 50-yr. old virgin, speaks. nt - tinear 13:10:23 09/18/05 (0)
- It's apparent to anyone reading these exchanges that a) you - tinear 10:56:57 09/18/05 (1)
- Disregard the above post. "Delete" doesn't seem to work. nt - tinear 11:06:45 09/18/05 (0)