At the outset let me say these are not my own, and to those like RGA who sneer at me so unpleasantly, I add, thanks for being a perfect model of the "internet personality"; see you in my next book maybe.Now:
1) Anthony Lane in the New Yorker (Victor will enjoy this): There has been much debate over Dan Brown’s novel ever since it was published, in 2003, but no question has been more contentious than this: if a person of sound mind begins reading the book at ten o’clock in the morning, at what time will he or she come to the realization that it is unmitigated junk? The answer, in my case, was 10:00.03, shortly after I read the opening sentence: “Renowned curator Jacques Saunière staggered through the vaulted archway of the museum’s Grand Gallery.†[I had the same sinking feeling.]
2) James Verniere in the Boston Herald: The movie is less cinematic than the book.
clark
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Topic - Two remarks on DVC - clarkjohnsen 07:28:27 05/24/06 (23)
- I don't believe anything I read in newspapers. They are all lies. - EdM 07:11:28 05/25/06 (0)
- just read the review by Anthony Lane - Analog Scott 12:11:46 05/24/06 (7)
- "I will bet he is a total neophyte when it comes to film." Name your dollars. Now, before it's too late. - clarkjohnsen 12:16:30 05/24/06 (6)
- Re: "I will bet he is a total neophyte when it comes to film." Name your dollars. Now, before it's too late. - Analog Scott 17:58:03 05/24/06 (4)
- Weaseling out, we see. How unexpected! nt - clarkjohnsen 07:46:15 05/25/06 (3)
- What part of "sure" did you fail to understand? nt - Analog Scott 08:14:26 05/25/06 (2)
- Previous estimate of you stands. Begone. nt - clarkjohnsen 08:33:46 05/25/06 (1)
- This from a guy who doesn't know what "sure" means? I am so hurt. nt - Analog Scott 08:47:57 05/25/06 (0)
- Anthony Lane apparently knows as little about lemmings going over cliffs, ... - Audiophilander 13:14:27 05/24/06 (0)
- I am curious.... - Analog Scott 11:13:20 05/24/06 (13)
- Anthony Lane - rico 12:39:46 05/24/06 (6)
- Re: Anthony Lane - Analog Scott 18:03:39 05/24/06 (0)
- "Brilliant" doesn't rate with some of our posters here. nt - clarkjohnsen 13:21:01 05/24/06 (4)
- you think that guy's review of DaVinci code was brilliant? - Analog Scott 18:05:31 05/24/06 (2)
- I was replying to a rico remark. nt - clarkjohnsen 07:42:47 05/25/06 (1)
- So? nt - Analog Scott 08:16:04 05/25/06 (0)
- Yes it does; I've seen those Guinness commercials too. Cheers! (nt) - Audiophilander 13:32:12 05/24/06 (0)
- " I am all for qualitiy criticism. Do these guys ever offer that?" - clarkjohnsen 12:10:16 05/24/06 (5)
- Re: " I am all for qualitiy criticism. Do these guys ever offer that?" - Analog Scott 18:21:29 05/24/06 (4)
- You've missed every point *and* you've not read the book. Or maybe that's why. nt - clarkjohnsen 07:44:33 05/25/06 (3)
- You aren't making sense. having trouble following the content of simple posts? nt - Analog Scott 08:18:18 05/25/06 (2)
- Oh, so now you've read the book? That's what my post was about. nt - clarkjohnsen 08:31:12 05/25/06 (1)
- Yep, you still aren't getting the content of simple posts. Sad. nt. - Analog Scott 08:50:12 05/25/06 (0)