In Reply to: Two remarks on DVC posted by clarkjohnsen on May 24, 2006 at 07:28:27:
WHAT AN IDIOT!!!! the movie was hardly great but this guy's review is the biggest turd so far associated with this movie. The review is nothing more than string pompous cynical throw away jabs laced with blatent inaccuracies. Some one asked why do they even pay critics. After reading this review I think it is a fair question. Let me guess, I don't know anything about this guy but I will bet he is a total neophyte when it comes to film. Another Comicbook guy in the flesh.
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- just read the review by Anthony Lane - Analog Scott 12:11:46 05/24/06 (7)
- "I will bet he is a total neophyte when it comes to film." Name your dollars. Now, before it's too late. - clarkjohnsen 12:16:30 05/24/06 (6)
- Re: "I will bet he is a total neophyte when it comes to film." Name your dollars. Now, before it's too late. - Analog Scott 17:58:03 05/24/06 (4)
- Weaseling out, we see. How unexpected! nt - clarkjohnsen 07:46:15 05/25/06 (3)
- What part of "sure" did you fail to understand? nt - Analog Scott 08:14:26 05/25/06 (2)
- Previous estimate of you stands. Begone. nt - clarkjohnsen 08:33:46 05/25/06 (1)
- This from a guy who doesn't know what "sure" means? I am so hurt. nt - Analog Scott 08:47:57 05/25/06 (0)
- Anthony Lane apparently knows as little about lemmings going over cliffs, ... - Audiophilander 13:14:27 05/24/06 (0)