Follow Ups Full Thread

Topic - Two remarks on DVC - clarkjohnsen 07:28:27 05/24/06 (23)

• I don't believe anything I read in newspapers. They are all lies. - EdM 07:11:28 05/25/06 (0)
• just read the review by Anthony Lane - Analog Scott 12:11:46 05/24/06 (7)
• "I will bet he is a total neophyte when it comes to film." Name your dollars. Now, before it's too late. - clarkjohnsen 12:16:30 05/24/06 (6)
• Re: "I will bet he is a total neophyte when it comes to film." Name your dollars. Now, before it's too late. - Analog Scott 17:58:03 05/24/06 (4)
• Weaseling out, we see. How unexpected! nt - clarkjohnsen 07:46:15 05/25/06 (3)
• What part of "sure" did you fail to understand? nt - Analog Scott 08:14:26 05/25/06 (2)
• Previous estimate of you stands. Begone. nt - clarkjohnsen 08:33:46 05/25/06 (1)
• This from a guy who doesn't know what "sure" means? I am so hurt. nt - Analog Scott 08:47:57 05/25/06 (0)
• Anthony Lane apparently knows as little about lemmings going over cliffs, ... - Audiophilander 13:14:27 05/24/06 (0)
• I am curious.... - Analog Scott 11:13:20 05/24/06 (13)
• Anthony Lane - rico 12:39:46 05/24/06 (6)
• Re: Anthony Lane - Analog Scott 18:03:39 05/24/06 (0)
• "Brilliant" doesn't rate with some of our posters here. nt - clarkjohnsen 13:21:01 05/24/06 (4)
• you think that guy's review of DaVinci code was brilliant? - Analog Scott 18:05:31 05/24/06 (2)
• I was replying to a rico remark. nt - clarkjohnsen 07:42:47 05/25/06 (1)
• So? nt - Analog Scott 08:16:04 05/25/06 (0)
• Yes it does; I've seen those Guinness commercials too. Cheers! (nt) - Audiophilander 13:32:12 05/24/06 (0)
• " I am all for qualitiy criticism. Do these guys ever offer that?" - clarkjohnsen 12:10:16 05/24/06 (5)
• Re: " I am all for qualitiy criticism. Do these guys ever offer that?" - Analog Scott 18:21:29 05/24/06 (4)
• You've missed every point *and* you've not read the book. Or maybe that's why. nt - clarkjohnsen 07:44:33 05/25/06 (3)
• You aren't making sense. having trouble following the content of simple posts? nt - Analog Scott 08:18:18 05/25/06 (2)
• Oh, so now you've read the book? That's what my post was about. nt - clarkjohnsen 08:31:12 05/25/06 (1)
• Yep, you still aren't getting the content of simple posts. Sad. nt. - Analog Scott 08:50:12 05/25/06 (0)

Follow Ups

• What part of "sure" did you fail to understand? nt - Analog Scott 08:14:26 05/25/06 (2)
• Previous estimate of you stands. Begone. nt - clarkjohnsen 08:33:46 05/25/06 (1)
• This from a guy who doesn't know what "sure" means? I am so hurt. nt - Analog Scott 08:47:57 05/25/06 (0)