In Reply to: Two remarks on DVC posted by clarkjohnsen on May 24, 2006 at 07:28:27:
Are you trying to prove the uselessness of some critics? If so you are doing a very good job. I am all for qualitiy criticism. Do these guys ever offer that? Were they just indulging themselves on this occassion or is this par for the course?
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- I am curious.... - Analog Scott 11:13:20 05/24/06 (13)
- Anthony Lane - rico 12:39:46 05/24/06 (6)
- Re: Anthony Lane - Analog Scott 18:03:39 05/24/06 (0)
- "Brilliant" doesn't rate with some of our posters here. nt - clarkjohnsen 13:21:01 05/24/06 (4)
- you think that guy's review of DaVinci code was brilliant? - Analog Scott 18:05:31 05/24/06 (2)
- I was replying to a rico remark. nt - clarkjohnsen 07:42:47 05/25/06 (1)
- So? nt - Analog Scott 08:16:04 05/25/06 (0)
- Yes it does; I've seen those Guinness commercials too. Cheers! (nt) - Audiophilander 13:32:12 05/24/06 (0)
- " I am all for qualitiy criticism. Do these guys ever offer that?" - clarkjohnsen 12:10:16 05/24/06 (5)
- Re: " I am all for qualitiy criticism. Do these guys ever offer that?" - Analog Scott 18:21:29 05/24/06 (4)
- You've missed every point *and* you've not read the book. Or maybe that's why. nt - clarkjohnsen 07:44:33 05/25/06 (3)
- You aren't making sense. having trouble following the content of simple posts? nt - Analog Scott 08:18:18 05/25/06 (2)
- Oh, so now you've read the book? That's what my post was about. nt - clarkjohnsen 08:31:12 05/25/06 (1)
- Yep, you still aren't getting the content of simple posts. Sad. nt. - Analog Scott 08:50:12 05/25/06 (0)