In Reply to: Re: Internet film documentary on 9/11 posted by sjb on December 24, 2006 at 08:34:49:
They show footage of the pentagon in slow motion -- there is no plane anywhere to be seen -- what about their argument related to the blast hole size versus the size of the plane. Not to mention the wrong engine parts being found. As they note jey fuel cannot reach the temperature to Vaporize the materials in the plane.And the Flight 93 thing is just odd - I would really like for something to be done on that. The vaporization argument is about as intelligent as the "magic bullit" theory that Arlen Spector pawned off on the sheep for Kennedy's Death. Though it certainly has not hurt his career.
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- Re: Internet film documentary on 9/11 - RGA 18:34:11 12/24/06 (5)
- Seems you expect more realism from Casino Royale than this "documentary." ;-) - sjb 20:05:19 12/24/06 (4)
- "The wings and tail would come off." That's pretty funny! - clarkjohnsen 09:55:34 12/26/06 (0)
- Re: Seems you expect more realism from Casino Royale than this "documentary." ;-) - RGA 00:45:38 12/25/06 (2)
- If you can't see that they are simply telling you things without coming anyhwere close to being close to - sjb 10:34:49 12/27/06 (1)
- Re: If you can't see that they are simply telling you things without coming anyhwere close to being close to - RGA 04:03:15 12/29/06 (0)