Home Films/DVD Asylum

Movies from comedy to drama to your favorite Hollyweird Star.

Seems you expect more realism from Casino Royale than this "documentary." ;-)

They show five frames of footage shot by a camera that only shot a frame every second or so. A plane or anything else going by at 500+mph isn't going to show up very well.

The hole is about perfect for the fuselage of a 757. The wings and tail would come off. Who says the wrong engine parts were found? The makers of the film? How do you know that they're showing you everything that was found. How do you even know that that picture of the engine part came from the Pentagon crash site.

They show a periodic table and then tell us what jet fuel can and can't burn or melt, etc. Did you double check those figures or just take their word for it? What studies did they show in reagrds to the effects of that kind of impact against reinforced concrete and steel by the wing and tail sections?

By basically saying that what they've said and shown is the truth and dossn't leave out things that go against their argument you're certainly giving them a LOT of latitiude.

I'm not saying that there aren't legitimate question marks just that these "documentary" makers did a piss poor job of making a case that withstands even a little bit of scrutiny. And if they can't be honest about how they show you what they show you how can we trust them to be honest about what they're surmising.


Don't piss on my shoe and tell me it's raining.


This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
  Kimber Kable  


Follow Ups Full Thread
Follow Ups


You can not post to an archived thread.