In Reply to: Soviet Army was much bigger than the Allied Army... posted by oscar on June 25, 2007 at 11:00:24:
"And yes, the Soviet's did have an Air Force which played a large role in decimating the Luftwaffe."
I'd like to see your facts on this. I believe the Luftwaffe was generated decimated from Germany's failed assault on England, and by the U.S. after France was liberated. Czeh pilots escaped to England to fight for the Royal Air Force. I would imagine if the Soviet Union had such a lethal Air Force, they would have saved themselves some travel time and left for the Soviet Union rather than England.
"Keep in mind the Hiroshima bombs were little kiloton affairs (if that) which would be considered "tactical" nukes in modern parlance."
We are not discussing "modern parlance." They were strong enough to cause Japan to surrender. Would several million deaths, or potential deaths, have cause Stalin to decide that maintaining control over the Eastern Block countries was not worth the potential cost to Soviet lives, given that they were incapable of delivering a similar blow? We'll never know because Truman never played the card. And millions suffered.
"I think it could have been a magnificent fight but the ending might have been a Soviet-dominated Europe"
If Stalin thought he could do the job, he would have done so. You may be more sure of the Soviets ability than they were.
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- RE: Soviet Army was much bigger than the Allied Army... - jamesgarvin 15:47:27 06/25/07 (16)
- RE: Soviet Army was much bigger than the Allied Army... - Tom Brennan 17:56:56 06/25/07 (15)
- when Harry Met Sally, oh sorry, I thought it was a film forum... Wnen Germany Met The USSR... - dave c 15:18:14 06/26/07 (0)
- Perhaps you should check your facts... - jamesgarvin 08:02:35 06/26/07 (13)
- You quoted the state of the Soviet Union in 1941. - oscar 08:31:50 06/27/07 (3)
- RE: You quoted the state of the Soviet Union in 1941. - jamesgarvin 10:08:51 06/27/07 (2)
- You need better sources than Wikipedia.... - oscar 10:47:03 06/27/07 (1)
- RE: You need better sources than Wikipedia.... - jamesgarvin 09:07:29 06/28/07 (0)
- RE: Perhaps you should check your facts... - Tom Brennan 11:37:16 06/26/07 (0)
- That would seem to answer the question... unless one challenges Wikipedia... nt - clarkjohnsen 08:19:12 06/26/07 (7)
- so Wikipedia is the unchallenged source of all historical knowledge? - groovenoter 22:49:57 06/26/07 (5)
- You are discussing a different issue.. - jamesgarvin 10:22:40 06/27/07 (4)
- Have you analyzed the available combat air power available to the Soviet Union vs. - oscar 15:50:09 06/27/07 (3)
- RE: Have you analyzed the available combat air power available to the Soviet Union vs. - jamesgarvin 08:58:05 06/28/07 (2)
- Beautiful post. Fact. Firmly establishes the original assertion. Reasoning. nt - clarkjohnsen 11:02:57 06/28/07 (0)
- There's that 1941 state of affairs compared to 1944 State of affairs. - oscar 09:55:22 06/28/07 (0)
- How dare anyone challenge he wisdom of the underpants of Wiki? - dave c 15:20:55 06/26/07 (0)