In Reply to: "It really needs to be seen on the big screen in 3D" --why? posted by Jazz Inmate on February 27, 2012 at 10:55:30:
it is one of the best examples of 3D done right, that is used to accomplish artistic ends - and if I had not already seen it in 3D, I would see it before it leaves the 3d theaters. And I may actually see it again that way. 3D is not always great, and sometimes it even detracts, but when done right, it is a treat.
Edits: 02/27/12 02/27/12
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- While I am sure it will be fine in 2D... - tunenut 12:47:04 02/27/12 (11)
- Exactly...(nt) - mkuller 21:20:03 02/27/12 (10)
- it's more of a distraction than a necessity - Jazz Inmate 16:44:33 02/28/12 (9)
- more data for your survey... - tunenut 18:10:41 02/28/12 (7)
- RE: more data for your survey... - Jazz Inmate 20:56:52 02/28/12 (6)
- So you haven't actually seen the film in 3D... - mkuller 11:58:49 02/29/12 (5)
- Not sure what you're yammering about but I made no comment about the 3D presentation NT - Jazz Inmate 18:04:42 02/29/12 (4)
- No comment? Your entire comment above... - mkuller 18:51:46 02/29/12 (3)
- RE: No comment? Your entire comment above... - Jazz Inmate 10:04:05 03/01/12 (2)
- Your reading comprehension and... - mkuller 10:42:57 03/01/12 (1)
- you just proved my point - Jazz Inmate 15:14:18 03/05/12 (0)
- While my family and I certainly... - mkuller 16:47:25 02/28/12 (0)