In Reply to: Exactly...(nt) posted by mkuller on February 27, 2012 at 21:20:03:
In my very unscientific survey, acquaintances who failed to get into the story and had significant criticisms saw the 3D version and those who thoroughly enjoyed all aspects of the film saw the 2D version. I'm sure the 3D was very nice, and done right, but I'm watching it now and the picture has excellent depth and conveys the elevated cinematographic achievement perfectly in "2D".
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- it's more of a distraction than a necessity - Jazz Inmate 16:44:33 02/28/12 (9)
- more data for your survey... - tunenut 18:10:41 02/28/12 (7)
- RE: more data for your survey... - Jazz Inmate 20:56:52 02/28/12 (6)
- So you haven't actually seen the film in 3D... - mkuller 11:58:49 02/29/12 (5)
- Not sure what you're yammering about but I made no comment about the 3D presentation NT - Jazz Inmate 18:04:42 02/29/12 (4)
- No comment? Your entire comment above... - mkuller 18:51:46 02/29/12 (3)
- RE: No comment? Your entire comment above... - Jazz Inmate 10:04:05 03/01/12 (2)
- Your reading comprehension and... - mkuller 10:42:57 03/01/12 (1)
- you just proved my point - Jazz Inmate 15:14:18 03/05/12 (0)
- While my family and I certainly... - mkuller 16:47:25 02/28/12 (0)