In Reply to: more data for your survey... posted by tunenut on February 28, 2012 at 18:10:41:
It's not that I'm against it. I just see it as a frill, and not a viable replacement for traditional approaches to film. I'm sure Scorsese did a better job than Cameron, but the option of putting glasses over my glasses to access what I consider a gimmick is not why I wanted to see this film. For me, it was very profound, personal experience to watch Hugo and 3D wasn't going to add to that experience in a meaningful way. That doesn't mean I have anything technically against 3D or that I oppose it. It's just not for me.
Edits: 02/28/12
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- RE: more data for your survey... - Jazz Inmate 20:56:52 02/28/12 (6)
- So you haven't actually seen the film in 3D... - mkuller 11:58:49 02/29/12 (5)
- Not sure what you're yammering about but I made no comment about the 3D presentation NT - Jazz Inmate 18:04:42 02/29/12 (4)
- No comment? Your entire comment above... - mkuller 18:51:46 02/29/12 (3)
- RE: No comment? Your entire comment above... - Jazz Inmate 10:04:05 03/01/12 (2)
- Your reading comprehension and... - mkuller 10:42:57 03/01/12 (1)
- you just proved my point - Jazz Inmate 15:14:18 03/05/12 (0)