In Reply to: Best Director Award: obsolete? posted by TAFKA Steve on January 22, 2002 at 13:33:16:
were made by committees and had most of their creative control in the hands of producers, actors, advertisers/product placement agencys. Directors may be responsible for the "look" and pacing of the film, but little more.
- contractual agreements about what brand of cigarettes the actor must smoke.
- that a can of coke must be in at least 4 shots (and the actor drinking it must be enjoying it).
- that actor so-and-so won't take the part unless they aren't portrayed as a hooker, eventhough it is a film about prostitution. But since the producers did a deal with the distributors that actor so-and-so had to be in it, the key plot lines must all be re-written to make key plotlines more acceptable for the actors.I'm not a cynic!
It's nearly all about where the money comes from and who gets it back.I think you are right!
Cheers
John K
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- I thought that most big money hollywood films these days .......... - JDK 14:02:18 01/23/02 (4)
- Isn't the Best Director Oscar voted on strictly by peers (directors)? - TAFKA Steve 16:11:11 01/23/02 (3)
- Re: Not the way I read it - JDK 01:33:18 01/24/02 (2)
- You're right, I mixed it up with DGA awards. - TAFKA Steve 04:43:29 01/24/02 (1)
- This just in: Director's Guild nominates Ridley Scott, snubs Robert Altman. (nt) - TAFKA Steve 15:19:36 01/24/02 (0)