In Reply to: Someone's really good explanation of why LOTR has bored me and so many others. posted by clarkjohnsen on December 21, 2003 at 13:50:15:
kids, as is Star Wars and Harry Potter.
The problem with LOTR, of course, is the need to create all that fantastic (literally) excess when this world has much more interesting stuff within IT.
Good science fiction is NOT in the same class, btw. The well done material in that genre is believable (which is why 2001 far surpasses Star Wars and its cuddly, smarmy characters).
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- Quite simply, it's a yarn for - tinear 05:28:01 12/23/03 (34)
- W. H. Auden didn't think so. - Harmonia 19:53:45 12/23/03 (0)
- Then Homer and Virgil will be over your head also. (nt - dennzio 12:55:09 12/23/03 (3)
- So now you've sunk to comparing the blind one and his - tinear 13:15:31 12/23/03 (2)
- The Aeneid was of course Virgil as a Homer wannabe. - dennzio 17:12:28 12/23/03 (1)
- PS: you can teach me about D&D someday. (nt - dennzio 17:13:35 12/23/03 (0)
- Did you people really miss the philosophical dimension of this epic? - Tadlo 07:40:46 12/23/03 (28)
- Doesn't it have to do with insufficient water? - geoffkait 09:06:03 12/23/03 (0)
- This is exactly WHAT'S wrong WITH it! - Troy 08:30:06 12/23/03 (19)
- Not entirely predictable - Tadlo 16:14:00 12/23/03 (0)
- YOU GOT THAT RIGHT! And long live Wagner. nt - clarkjohnsen 14:31:35 12/23/03 (1)
- Re: YOU GOT THAT RIGHT! And long live Wagner./The antisemit bastard.nt - patrickU 02:41:16 12/25/03 (0)
- With all due respect, you are rudely mistaken. - Audiophilander 10:08:00 12/23/03 (15)
- Re: With all due respect, you are rudely mistaken. - Troy 10:50:44 12/23/03 (14)
- You offered no real valid literary criticisms, just a very average personal opinion, how could anybody take offense? - dennzio 13:24:40 12/23/03 (0)
- "BBs are designed for people to put forth their opinions" - Well, one hopes that those opinions would be informed! - Audiophilander 11:46:31 12/23/03 (12)
- BwaaHAAAAAAAA! - Troy 13:06:02 12/23/03 (11)
- Re: BwaaHAAAAAAAA! - Tadlo 16:23:00 12/23/03 (0)
- And just to show . . . - Troy 13:37:07 12/23/03 (9)
- Yep, missed that one. - Audiophilander 14:47:32 12/23/03 (8)
- You missed this too - Troy 15:27:24 12/23/03 (7)
- I'll accept your intent, but let's get the impression straight. - Audiophilander 22:19:30 12/24/03 (6)
- Look past your "red haze" - Troy 11:42:27 12/25/03 (5)
- "If I was a troll, I'd have handled my responses differently than I have, goading you even further." LOL! - Audiophilander 23:54:12 12/25/03 (4)
- Hey, I'm just playing nice here - Troy 17:29:54 12/26/03 (3)
- One last time; I'll see your nice ante and raise it as politely as I can: - Audiophilander 00:48:27 12/27/03 (2)
- We just don't see eye to eye - Troy 08:42:43 12/27/03 (1)
- "chasing windmills" ...? Wrong movie; wrong book! Terry Gilliam has thus far failed where Peter Jackson succeeded. - Audiophilander 09:21:51 12/29/03 (0)
- Yup, just like I missed the great sociological insights of - tinear 08:03:52 12/23/03 (6)
- Well, there is this small difference - Tadlo 08:33:00 12/23/03 (5)
- Au contraire. The sociological insights ARE - tinear 12:03:17 12/23/03 (2)
- Re: Au contraire. The sociological insights ARE - Tadlo 16:39:24 12/23/03 (1)
- Ok, fair knight, I yield the field. But still, I think Mallory's much - tinear 11:57:43 12/24/03 (0)
- Re: And didn't Wagner... - rico 10:28:29 12/23/03 (1)
- One knows one has stumbled into fantasy-land when - tinear 11:59:14 12/23/03 (0)