In Reply to: This is exactly WHAT'S wrong WITH it! posted by Troy on December 23, 2003 at 08:30:06:
These films will hardly be dated one whit in my estimation! They are accessible to anyone, regardless of age, with an imagination and love of the fantasy genre. Furthermore, these films have greater philosophical depth than 90% of the so-called adult fare coming out of Hollywood today, but that's a rather foolish argument anyway since large scale productions are intended as broadly accessible entertainment first and foremost. I'm sorry that you never acquired a taste for sombre and serious fantasy films, but I don't recall Tolkien's Ring trilogy EVER being slated as a Monty Python project! ;^)BTW, nearly every epic story of heroism is predictable to a greater or lesser extent, and especially those which are based on myths and legends. You may find Tolkien's Ring Trilogy ponderous, but one man's ponderous is another's masterpiece; I'm sure that there are films you like that I would find tedious in the extreme, but such differences may be merely a matter of tastes or preferences, are they not? If I called films that you considered great artistic achievements "children's fare" I'm pretty sure that you would take umbrage to my demagoguery of your tastes on some level, so how about lightening up about the LoTR trilogy before someone decides to get medieval on your Orcish arse, metaphorically speaking, of course.
AuPh
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- With all due respect, you are rudely mistaken. - Audiophilander 10:08:00 12/23/03 (15)
- Re: With all due respect, you are rudely mistaken. - Troy 10:50:44 12/23/03 (14)
- You offered no real valid literary criticisms, just a very average personal opinion, how could anybody take offense? - dennzio 13:24:40 12/23/03 (0)
- "BBs are designed for people to put forth their opinions" - Well, one hopes that those opinions would be informed! - Audiophilander 11:46:31 12/23/03 (12)
- BwaaHAAAAAAAA! - Troy 13:06:02 12/23/03 (11)
- Re: BwaaHAAAAAAAA! - Tadlo 16:23:00 12/23/03 (0)
- And just to show . . . - Troy 13:37:07 12/23/03 (9)
- Yep, missed that one. - Audiophilander 14:47:32 12/23/03 (8)
- You missed this too - Troy 15:27:24 12/23/03 (7)
- I'll accept your intent, but let's get the impression straight. - Audiophilander 22:19:30 12/24/03 (6)
- Look past your "red haze" - Troy 11:42:27 12/25/03 (5)
- "If I was a troll, I'd have handled my responses differently than I have, goading you even further." LOL! - Audiophilander 23:54:12 12/25/03 (4)
- Hey, I'm just playing nice here - Troy 17:29:54 12/26/03 (3)
- One last time; I'll see your nice ante and raise it as politely as I can: - Audiophilander 00:48:27 12/27/03 (2)
- We just don't see eye to eye - Troy 08:42:43 12/27/03 (1)
- "chasing windmills" ...? Wrong movie; wrong book! Terry Gilliam has thus far failed where Peter Jackson succeeded. - Audiophilander 09:21:51 12/29/03 (0)