In Reply to: Begging your pardon, you can't reliably say that. nt posted by clarkjohnsen on May 2, 2004 at 12:49:23:
Well, I have hundreds of films on DVD and I can only state what I see...and heard.
Some PAL have just a higher resolution than NTSC, and you can see it. As for the sound, it has the same quality.
But I would not make a big story about it. It depends of how much labor of love have been put in one production.
But to say that NTSC is generally better that PAL in picture AND sound is just not true.
In my opinion.
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- Re: Begging your pardon, you can't reliably say that. nt - patrickU 13:09:14 05/02/04 (9)
- "I can only state what I see..." *on your system*. Therein lies the problem. - clarkjohnsen 13:47:27 05/02/04 (8)
- Mine is bigger... here we go again... - Victor Khomenko 05:42:58 05/03/04 (3)
- "Just what does the size of screen have to do with quality?" Lots. - clarkjohnsen 08:43:26 05/03/04 (2)
- Not a good answer at all - Victor Khomenko 09:28:37 05/03/04 (1)
- Not a good answer at all - clarkjohnsen 14:06:37 05/03/04 (0)
- Re: "I can only state what I see..." *on your system*. Therein lies the problem. - patrickU 01:00:04 05/03/04 (0)
- Re: "I can only state what I see..." *on your system*. Therein lies the problem. - patrickU 00:25:05 05/03/04 (2)
- What most people mean, when they say PAL is better, is... - clarkjohnsen 08:45:21 05/03/04 (1)
- Re: What most people mean, when they say PAL is better, is... - patrickU 09:21:51 05/03/04 (0)