In Reply to: Re: Begging your pardon, you can't reliably say that. nt posted by patrickU on May 2, 2004 at 13:09:14:
I have access to big-screen front-projectors of extremely high resolution, and there one may truly see the truth. Decisions made on measely 1m. screens like I own (and yourself?), are apt to be mistaken. Hence, unreliable.PAL des not have "higher resolution" although it does have more scan lines. Tell us what its horizontal capability is.
I never said NTSC had better sound, only that it was way ahead in incorporating stereo.
"Labor of love" might be the most critical factor withall.
clark
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- "I can only state what I see..." *on your system*. Therein lies the problem. - clarkjohnsen 13:47:27 05/02/04 (8)
- Mine is bigger... here we go again... - Victor Khomenko 05:42:58 05/03/04 (3)
- "Just what does the size of screen have to do with quality?" Lots. - clarkjohnsen 08:43:26 05/03/04 (2)
- Not a good answer at all - Victor Khomenko 09:28:37 05/03/04 (1)
- Not a good answer at all - clarkjohnsen 14:06:37 05/03/04 (0)
- Re: "I can only state what I see..." *on your system*. Therein lies the problem. - patrickU 01:00:04 05/03/04 (0)
- Re: "I can only state what I see..." *on your system*. Therein lies the problem. - patrickU 00:25:05 05/03/04 (2)
- What most people mean, when they say PAL is better, is... - clarkjohnsen 08:45:21 05/03/04 (1)
- Re: What most people mean, when they say PAL is better, is... - patrickU 09:21:51 05/03/04 (0)