In Reply to: Re: I don't get your analogy posted by jamesgarvin on June 28, 2005 at 09:03:24:
You seem to live under wrong presumption that I would like to spend more time discussing the reasons LOTR is bad film... not so, I am not looking to relieving that wonderful experience.I posted on my emotions of meeting it once again, this time in expanded time frame, not anything else. It always makes me feel funny when someone demands that I say more than I am inclined to say at the moment... well, just as you, I say what I feel like. If subject warrants, I say more, if not, then, well, not.
You are welcome to address something I specifically stated in my post. But I am not inclined right now to go into the LOTR - we already spent more time on it than it deserves.
I still, of course, strongly disagree with your notion of evaluating films, etc. based on their categories, as I simply see no one category as lower than others. The reason we sometimes don't see significant works in Category A is simply because no good director ever made a movie in it. Great movie can be made in ANY category or genre, just like great paintings have been produced in any sort of genre too.
BTW - in my post above the work kaka referred not to the film (which IS kaka, in my view...) but a particular aspect of it. If you want, you can replace it with the word shit, and see how it reads.
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- Re: I don't get your analogy - Victor Khomenko 11:26:05 06/28/05 (1)
- Re: I don't get your analogy - jamesgarvin 13:09:20 06/28/05 (0)