In Reply to: "King Kong" posted by rico on December 2, 2004 at 13:36:23:
While it may prove to be a good film, I have to agree with Tosh. Why does Hollywood insist on recreating classics which do not need to be recreated? The 1970s version of Kong being a prime example of how bad it can be.Also needlessly on the chopping block soon: Willy Wonka.
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- Re: "King Kong" - mishmashmusic 08:58:34 12/03/04 (10)
- Willy Wonka - Bulkington 09:06:32 12/06/04 (0)
- Re: "King Kong" - Analog Scott 11:54:31 12/04/04 (8)
- Hollywood/Indie - Bulkington 09:09:02 12/06/04 (0)
- Re: "King Kong" - mishmashmusic 17:06:28 12/04/04 (6)
- Re: "King Kong" - Analog Scott 17:10:58 12/04/04 (5)
- Re: "King Kong" - mishmashmusic 13:37:16 12/05/04 (4)
- Re: "King Kong" - Analog Scott 21:37:12 12/05/04 (3)
- Re: "King Kong" - mishmashmusic 06:12:46 12/06/04 (2)
- Re: "King Kong" - Analog Scott 16:44:05 12/06/04 (1)
- I'm just messing with you - mishmashmusic 06:38:44 12/07/04 (0)