In Reply to: A critic's job.... posted by mkuller on January 5, 2006 at 14:57:00:
is to critique and judge on artistic merits, not on "entertainment value".So a food critic should not discuss the taste of the dish? Only the presentation? I would think that taste is closer to entertainment, the presentation closer to art. How about the video game critic? How about a automobile reviewer? Damned if the thing did not drive smoothly, was fun, but, man, the looks. Who designed these features? Not recommended."
A critic should not review films and music designed to simply entertain an audience? I lauged, but, I cannot recommend this mindless piece of you know what to anyone. "I tapped my toes, but, by golly, it is too simple, heck, only three chords, obviously has no artistic value, so, thumbs down?
"Britney Spears, audience favorites, would be the darlings of the pop/rock music critics."
Britney Spears lack of critical acclaim has less to do with the music, and more to do with the fact that the critics who review her are not within her demographic. The critics blasted Elvis when he plopped on the scene in 1954-1955. They were out of the demographic. Critics praised his "comeback special" in 1969. Ironically, with much of the same material. They were now in the demographic.
I guess I need to stop watching Animal House.
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- Re: A critic's job.... - jamesgarvin 15:48:37 01/05/06 (4)
- On Film And Food Taste.... - AudioHead 12:41:22 01/10/06 (2)
- Re: On Film And Food Taste.... - jamesgarvin 13:29:34 01/10/06 (1)
- Re: On Film And Food Taste.... - AudioHead 10:35:58 01/11/06 (0)
- Re: A critic's job.... - RGA 18:01:43 01/05/06 (0)