In Reply to: Roger Ebert defends himslef against being accused as soft on movies... posted by RGA on January 4, 2006 at 19:35:14:
critic who has written eloquently about a number of high-quality films, then gives both 'Anaconda' and 'Last House On The Left'
3&1/2 stars out a possible 4? That would mean he would consider
them almost on par with 'Citizen Kane' and 'Casablana', two films
he has constantly railed about over the years. Or is it possible
he somehow manages to separate critical value from entertainment
value in his reviews? If so, would it be appropriate that he inform
his audience about that putative separation? ~AH
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- Can Any Reliable Conclusions Be Drawn About A.... - AudioHead 05:59:48 01/07/06 (9)
- Re: Can Any Reliable Conclusions Be Drawn About A.... - rico 10:33:50 01/07/06 (8)
- Re: Can Any Reliable Conclusions Be Drawn About A.... - RGA 12:55:49 01/07/06 (7)
- .Well, Do You Think That... - AudioHead 05:45:33 01/08/06 (6)
- Re: .Well, Do You Think That... - RGA 11:22:40 01/08/06 (5)
- Evidently You Think That....... - AudioHead 11:40:27 01/10/06 (4)
- Re: Evidently You Think That....... - RGA 16:13:44 01/13/06 (3)
- Re: Evidently You Think That....... - AudioHead 06:59:05 01/16/06 (2)
- Re: Evidently You Think That....... - RGA 18:14:06 01/16/06 (1)
- Funny You Should Mention ..... - AudioHead 06:33:12 01/17/06 (0)