In Reply to: RE: Perhaps it doesn't occur to you and the other guy that posted by Peter H-son on November 21, 2007 at 22:05:58:
he even had theater approval rights at one point. actually many directors did have what amounted to final cut back in the seventies when film was very much a director's medium. But as for today, indeed big budget movies are pretty much all test screened and final cut privilidges go to suits who are basing final cutson the score cards handed in by a few hundred snot nosed teenagers that think MTV is art. So if you wonder why so many of those blockbusters suck dick this is one of the many reasons.
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- I'm pretty sure Kubrick did - Analog Scott 06:38:26 11/22/07 (6)
- Blockbusters "suck" because of the general subject matter: no - tinear 15:36:59 11/23/07 (4)
- RE: Blockbusters "suck" because of the general subject matter: no - Analog Scott 09:55:01 11/24/07 (3)
- Directors' cuts of Larry of A or Godfather? They also had - tinear 14:35:38 11/24/07 (1)
- RE: Directors' cuts of Larry of A or Godfather? They also had - Analog Scott 16:37:11 11/24/07 (0)
- The guys sits on the beach, does not work, lives off his wife's dime, and you are only on "pulp?" Idiot.nt - jamesgarvin 10:22:30 11/24/07 (0)
- RE: I'm pretty sure Kubrick did - Peter H-son 07:15:22 11/22/07 (0)